IN RE: GOOGLE INC. COOKIE PLACEMENT CONSUMER PRIVACY LITIGATION
Theodore H. Frank, Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued November 14, 2017.
Opinion filed: August 6, 2019.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Theodore H. Frank (Argued), Adam E. Schulman , Competitive Enterprise Institute, Center for Class Action Fairness, 1310 L Street, N.W., 7th Floor, Washington, DC, 20005, Counsel for Appellant.
James P. Frickleton , Bartimus Frickleton Robertson & Gorny, 11150 Overbrook Road, Suite 250, Leawood, KS 66211, Stephen G. Grygiel , Silverman Thompson Slutkin & White, 201 North Charles Street, Suite 2600, Baltimore, MD 21201 Brian R. Strange (Argued), Strange & Butler, 12100 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1900, Los Angeles, CA, 90025, Counsel for Appellees: Jose M. Bermudez; Nicholas Todd Heinrich; Lynne Krause.
Anthony J. Weibell (Argued), Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, 650 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, Michael H. Rubin , Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, One Market Street, Spear Tower, Suite 3300, San Francisco, CA, 94105, Counsel for Appellee, Google Inc.
M. Duncan Grant , Pepper Hamilton, 1313 Market Street, Hercules Plaza, Suite 5100, P.O. Box 1709, Wilmington, DE, 19899, Joseph A. Sullivan , Pepper Hamilton, 3000 Two Logan Square, 18th and Arch Streets, Philadelphia, PA, 19103, Counsel for Amicus Curiae: Association of Pro Bono Counsel; Community Legal Aid Society Inc.; Community Legal Services; Legal Services of New Jersey; National Legal Aid & Defender Association; Pennsylvania Legal Aid Network; Philadelphia Bar Foundation.
Oramel H. Skinner, III (Argued), Office of Attorney General of Arizona, 1275 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85007, Counsel for Amicus Appellant: Attorneys General for the States of Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Wisconsin.
Before: AMBRO, KRAUSE, and RENDELL, Circuit Judges.
OPINION OF THE COURT
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
Cases with many plaintiffs, few to none of whom will sue solely for themselves because the costs far outweigh the benefits, frequently result in class actions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. Prerequisites are having (1) so many class members...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
