NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. INGREDION INCORPORATED

No. 18-1155 Consolidated with 18-1244.

930 F.3d 509 (2019)

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. INGREDION INCORPORATED, d/b/a Penford Products Co., Respondent. Local 100G, Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC, Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided July 19, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian J. Paul , Indianapolis, IN, argued the cause for petitioner Ingredion Incorporated. With him on the briefs were Stuart R. Buttrick , Indianapolis, IN, Ryan J. Funk , Indianapolis, IN, Jeffrey P. Justman , Minneapolis, MN, and Kyle J. Essley , Minneapolis, MN.

Eric Weitz , Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent National Labor Relations Board. With him on the brief were Peter B. Robb , General Counsel, David S. Habenstreit , Assistant General Counsel, and Usha Dheenan , Supervisory Attorney.

Before: Rogers, Srinivasan, and Wilkins, Circuit Judges.


Ingredion, Inc. petitions for review of the Decision and Order of the National Labor Relations Board on the ground that five of the Board's findings, including that Ingredion violated the National Labor Relations Act ("the Act") by dealing directly with employees and denigrating a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases