KIDD v. THOMSON REUTERS CORP.

No. 17-3550 August Term, 2018.

925 F.3d 99 (2019)

Lindsey A. KIDD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided: May 30, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Francis , Francis & Mailman, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant.

Kevin King ( Eric C. Bosset & Neil K. Roman , on the brief), Covington & Burling, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before: Calabresi, Droney, Circuit Judges, and Underhill, Chief District Judge.


Plaintiff-Appellant Lindsey A. Kidd was the subject of a background check as part of an employment application process with the state of Georgia Department of Health ("Department"). The background check was performed using Defendant-Appellee Thomson Reuters' subscription-based internet platform, "CLEAR." The CLEAR report obtained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases