Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
MICHAEL DAVID GANNON , Baker & Hostetler LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by LEIF R. SIGMOND, JR. , JENNIFER KURCZ ; ALAINA J. LAKAWICZ , Philadelphia, PA; STEVEN BORSAND , JAY QUENTIN KNOBLOCH , Trading Technologies International, Inc., Chicago, IL.
BYRON LEROY PICKARD , Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellees in 2018-1105, 2018-1302, 2018-1438. Also represented by ROBERT EVAN SOKOHL , RICHARD M. BEMBEN , JON WRIGHT ,
KATHERINE TWOMEY ALLEN , Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor United States. Also represented by MARK R. FREEMAN , SCOTT R. McINTOSH , JOSEPH H. HUNT ; THOMAS W. KRAUSE , JOSEPH MATAL , FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED , Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA.
AMY J. NELSON , Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor Andrei Iancu in 2018-1443. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE , JOSEPH MATAL , FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED .
Before HUGHES, MAYER, and LINN,
This disposition is nonprecedential.
HUGHES, Circuit Judge.
Trading Technologies International, Inc., appeals four Covered Business Method Review decisions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board finding Trading Technologies' patents ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Recently, this Court issued two precedential opinions affirming Board...
NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.
Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.
As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.
GET STARTED
OR
