1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. IBG LLC
 

TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. IBG LLC

Nos. 2018-1105, 2018-1302, 2018-1438. 2018-1443.

TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellant, v. IBG LLC, INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC, Appellees, UNITED STATES, Intervenor, TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellant, v. IBG LLC, INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC, Appellees. UNITED STATES, Intervenor, TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellant, v. IBG LLC, INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC, Appellees, UNITED STATES, Intervenor, TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenors.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: May 21, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

MICHAEL DAVID GANNON , Baker & Hostetler LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by LEIF R. SIGMOND, JR. , JENNIFER KURCZ ; ALAINA J. LAKAWICZ , Philadelphia, PA; STEVEN BORSAND , JAY QUENTIN KNOBLOCH , Trading Technologies International, Inc., Chicago, IL.

BYRON LEROY PICKARD , Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellees in 2018-1105, 2018-1302, 2018-1438. Also represented by ROBERT EVAN SOKOHL , RICHARD M. BEMBEN , JON WRIGHT ,

KATHERINE TWOMEY ALLEN , Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor United States. Also represented by MARK R. FREEMAN , SCOTT R. McINTOSH , JOSEPH H. HUNT ; THOMAS W. KRAUSE , JOSEPH MATAL , FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED , Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA.

AMY J. NELSON , Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor Andrei Iancu in 2018-1443. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE , JOSEPH MATAL , FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED .

Before HUGHES, MAYER, and LINN,

This disposition is nonprecedential.

Trading Technologies International, Inc., appeals four Covered Business Method Review decisions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board finding Trading Technologies' patents ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Recently, this Court issued two precedential opinions affirming Board...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases