IRWIN INDUS. TOOL CO. v. U.S.

2018-1215.

920 F.3d 1356 (2019)

IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: April 9, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frances Pierson Hadfield , Crowell & Moring, LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by Daniel Cannistra , Washington, DC.

Matthew James Glover , Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by Jeanne Davidson , Joseph H. Hunt ; Amy Rubin , Guy Eddon , New York, NY; Michael W. Heydrich , Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, United States Department of Homeland Security, New York, NY.

Before Lourie, Mayer, and Reyna, Circuit Judges.


The United States appeals from the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade ("the Trade Court") granting Irwin Industrial Tool Company's ("Irwin") motion for summary judgment that its imported hand tools are properly classified as pliers, Irwin Indus. Tool Co. v. United States, 269 F.Supp.3d 1294 ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases