1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 916 F.3d
  5. 916 F.3d 1176 (2019)
 

WADLER v. BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC.

No. 17-16193.

916 F.3d 1176 (2019)

Sanford S. WADLER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation; Norman Schwartz, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed February 26, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kathleen M. Sullivan (argued) and William B. Adams , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, New York, New York; Karin Kramer , Andrew P. March , and John M. Potter , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, San Francisco, California; for Defendants-Appellants.

Michael John von Loewenfeldt (argued), Kenneth P. Nabity , and James M. Wagstaffe , Kerr & Wagstaffe LLP, San Francisco, California, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before: Susan P. Graber and Mark J. Bennett, Circuit Judges, and Leslie E. Kobayashi, District Judge.

OPINION

In this whistleblower retaliation case, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. ("Bio-Rad" or "the Company") and its CEO, Norman Schwartz, appeal an $11 million jury verdict in favor of Bio-Rad's former general counsel, Sanford Wadler.1 The jury found that Defendants violated the Sarbanes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases