1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 916 F.3d
  5. 916 F.3d 1023 (2019)
 

U.S. CAPITOL POLICE v. OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE

2018-1293, 2018-1396.

916 F.3d 1023 (2019)

UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE, Petitioner v. OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE, Cross-Applicant. Fraternal Order of Police, District of Columbia Lodge No. 1, U.S. Capitol Police Labor Committee, Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: February 21, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rafique Omar Anderson , Office of Employment Counsel, United States Capitol Police, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. Also represented by Frederick M. Herrera.

John D. Uelmen , Office of the General Counsel, United States Office of Compliance, Washington, DC, argued for cross-applicant. Also represented by Julia Akins Clark ; Simone Jenkins , Congressional Office of Compliance, Washington, DC.

Megan Kathleen Mechak , Woodley & McGillivary LLP, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor.

Before Newman, Lourie, and Clevenger, Circuit Judges.

On September 26, 2017, the Board of Directors of the Congressional Accountability Office of Compliance ("Board") issued a decision stating that the United States Capitol Police ("Police") committed an unfair labor practice when it refused to engage in arbitration of an unresolved grievance. U.S. Capitol Police and Fraternal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases