M. S. BY & THROUGH R.H. v. LA UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST.

No. 16-56472.

913 F.3d 1119 (2019)

M. S., a minor, BY AND THROUGH her guardian ad litem R.H., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, a Public Entity, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed January 24, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barrett K. Green (argued) and Cristen R. Hintze , Littler Mendelson P.C., Los Angeles, California; Mary Kellogg , Assistant General Counsel II; Devora Navera Reed , Chief Administrative Law & Litigation Counsel; David Holmquist , General Counsel; Office of General Counsel, Los Angeles Unified School District, Los Angeles, California; for Defendant-Appellant.

Allison Barret Holcombe (argued), Los Angeles, California; Shawna L. Parks , Law Office of Shawna L. Parks, Los Angeles, California; Janeen Steel , Learning Rights Law Center, Los Angeles, California; for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Summer D. Dalessandro and Howard J. Fulfrost , Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost LLP, Carlsbad, California; D. Michael Ambrose and Elaine M. Yama-Garcia , California School Boards Association/Education Legal Alliance, West Sacramento, California; for Amicus Curiae California School Boards Association's Educational Legal Alliance.

Selene Almazan-Altobelli , Ellen Saideman , and Alexis Casillas , Catherine Merino Reisman Counsel of Parent Attorneys and Advocates Inc., Towson, Maryland, for Amici Curiae Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates Inc. and California Association for Parent-Child Advocacy.

Suge Lee , Carly J. Munson , and Ben Conway , Disability Rights California, Oakland, California, for Amicus Curiae Disability Rights California.

Before: Dorothy W. Nelson and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges, and Robert W. Pratt, District Judge.


ORDER

The Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) appeals from the district court's Memorandum and Order reversing the administrative law judge's (ALJ) decision in an Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) action asserting the denial of a Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE). 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482.

The district court correctly concluded that M.S. was denied a FAPE because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases