MARTINEZ-DE RYAN v. WHITAKER

No. 15-70759.

909 F.3d 247 (2018)

Rocio Aurora MARTINEZ-DE RYAN, Petitioner, v. Matthew WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed July 17, 2018.

Amended November 16, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

K. Alexandra Monaco , The Monaco Law Group Ltd., Las Vegas, Nevada; Kari E. Hong, Boston College Law School, Newton, Massachusetts; for Petitioner.

Allison Frayer , Trial Attorney; Melissa Neiman-Keltin and Aimee J. Carmichael , Senior Litigation Counsel; John W. Blakeley , Assistant Director; Joseph H. Hunt , Assistant Attorney General; Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; for Respondent.

Stephen Manning , Innovation Law Lab, Portland, Oregon, for Amici Curiae Alameda County Public Defender's Office, Los Angeles County Public Defender's Office, Santa Barbara County Public Defender's Office, Santa Clara County Public Defender's Office, San Francisco Public Defender, Jeff Adachi , Santa Cruz County Public Defender's Office, Sonoma County Public Defender's Office, Jose Varela , Marin County Public Defender, and Dan deGriselles .

Jennifer Lee Koh , Immigration Clinic, Western State College of Law, Irvine, California; Evangeline G. Abriel , Santa Clara University School of Law, Santa Clara, California; for Amici Curiae American Immigration Lawyers Association, Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project, Immigrant Legal Resource Center, National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild, and U.C. Davis Immigration Clinic.

Before: Susan P. Graber and Richard C. Tallman, Circuit Judges, and Ivan L.R. Lemelle, District Judge.


ORDER

The opinion filed on July 17, 2018, and published at 895 F.3d 1191, is amended by the opinion filed concurrently with this order.

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny Petitioner's petition for panel rehearing. Judge Graber has voted to deny Petitioner's petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Tallman and Lemelle have so recommended.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases