1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 908 F.3d
  5. 908 F.3d 792 (2018)
 

ARISTA NETWORKS, INC. v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.

2017-1525, 2017-1577.

908 F.3d 792 (2018)

ARISTA NETWORKS, INC., Appellant v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Cross-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: November 9, 2018.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

LAUREN ANN DEGNAN , Fish & Richardson, PC, Washington, DC, and MATTHEW D. POWERS , Tensegrity Law Group LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL J. McKEON , ADAM SHARTZER , LINHONG ZHANG , Fish & Richardson, PC, Washington, DC; ROBERT LEWIS GERRITY , WILLIAM P. NELSON , Tensegrity Law Group LLP, Redwood Shores, CA.

JOHN C. O'QUINN , Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for cross-appellant. Also represented by CALVIN ALEXANDER SHANK , JASON M. WILCOX , WILLIAM H. BURGESS ; JON WRIGHT , DANIEL S. BLOCK , LORI A. GORDON , Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC.

Before Prost, Chief Judge, Schall and Chen, Circuit Judges.

Arista Networks, Inc. ("Arista") petitioned for an inter partes review ("IPR") of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,340,597 ("the '597 patent"), which is owned by Cisco Systems, Inc. ("Cisco"). After instituting an IPR, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("Board") upheld some of those challenged claims as patentable but...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases