U.S. CAPITOL POLICE v. OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE

2018-1502.

908 F.3d 776 (2018)

UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE, Respondent v. OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE, Applicant. Fraternal Order of Police, District of Columbia Lodge No. 1, U.S. Capitol Police Labor Committee, Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: November 6, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

FREDERICK M. HERRERA , Office of Employment Counsel, United States Capitol Police, Washington, DC, argued for respondent.

JOHN D. UELMEN , Office of the General Counsel, United States Office of Compliance, Washington, DC, argued for applicant. Also represented by JULIA AKINS CLARK.

MEGAN KATHLEEN MECHAK , Woodley & McGillivary LLP, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor.

Before Dyk, Linn, and Taranto, Circuit Judges.


The United States Capitol Police (Police) and the Fraternal Order of Police, District of Columbia Lodge No. 1, U.S. Capitol Police Labor Committee (Union) operate under a collective bargaining agreement that, although set to expire in June 2013, remains in force until the parties reach a new agreement. Pursuant to that agreement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases