1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 904 F.3d
  5. 904 F.3d 996 (2018)
 

E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & CO. v. SYNVINA C.V.

2017-1977.

904 F.3d 996 (2018)

E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, Archer Daniels Midland Company, Appellants v. SYNVINA C.V., Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: September 17, 2018.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

MICHAEL J. FLIBBERT , Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellants. Also represented by CHARLES COLLINS-CHASE.

PAUL M. RICHTER, JR. , Pepper Hamilton LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by MARK ALEXANDER CHAPMAN , Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, New York, NY.

Before Lourie, O'Malley, and Chen, Circuit Judges.

E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (collectively, "DuPont") appeal from an inter partes review ("IPR") decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the "Board"). See DuPont v. Furanix Techs. B.V., No. IPR2015-01838, Paper No. 43...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases