1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 904 F.3d
  5. 904 F.3d 996 (2018)
 

E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & CO. v. SYNVINA C.V.

2017-1977.

904 F.3d 996 (2018)

E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, Archer Daniels Midland Company, Appellants v. SYNVINA C.V., Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: September 17, 2018.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

MICHAEL J. FLIBBERT , Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellants. Also represented by CHARLES COLLINS-CHASE.

PAUL M. RICHTER, JR. , Pepper Hamilton LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by MARK ALEXANDER CHAPMAN , Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, New York, NY.

Before Lourie, O'Malley, and Chen, Circuit Judges.

E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (collectively, "DuPont") appeal from an inter partes review ("IPR") decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the "Board"). See DuPont v. Furanix Techs. B.V., No. IPR2015-01838, Paper No. 43...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases