U.S. v. OCHOA-OREGEL

No. 16-50413.

904 F.3d 682 (2018)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco OCHOA-OREGEL, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed August 2, 2018.

Amended September 14, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Whitney Z. Bernstein (argued), Federal Defenders of San Diego Inc., San Diego, California, for Defendant-Appellant.

Nicole Ries Fox (argued), Assistant United States Attorney; Helen H. Hong , Chief, Appellate Section; United States Attorney's Office, San Diego, California; for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before: Ronald M. Gould and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges, and Dana L. Christensen, Chief District Judge.


ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION

The opinion filed on August 2, 2018 and published at 898 F.3d 948 is AMENDED as follows.

The second sentence of the third paragraph states:

As Ochoa's removal proceeding was in absentia, he has satisfied the exhaustion and deprivation of judicial review requirements.

That sentence is deleted and replaced with the following...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases