U.S. EX REL. SILINGO v. WELLPOINT, INC.

No. 16-56400.

904 F.3d 667 (2018)

UNITED STATES EX REL. ANITA SILINGO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WELLPOINT, INC., an Indiana corporation; Anthem Blue Cross, business entity, form unknown; Health Net, Inc.; Health Net of California, Inc., a California corporation; Health Net Life Insurance Company, a California corporation; Visiting Nurse Service Choice, business organization, form unknown; Molina Healthcare, Inc., a Delaware corporation; Molina Healthcare of California, a California corporation; Molina Healthcare of California Partner Plan, Inc., a California corporation; Alameda Alliance for Health, a business organization, form unknown; Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company, a California corporation; Blue Cross of California, a California corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed July 9, 2018.

Amended September 11, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Abram Jay Zinberg (argued), The Zinberg Law Firm A.P.C., Huntington Beach, California; William K. Hanagami , The Hanagami Law Firm A.P.C., Woodland Hills, California; for Plaintiff-Appellant.

David Jeffrey Leviss (argued) and Amanda M. Santella , O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Washington, D.C.; Elizabeth M. Bock , Sabrina Strong , and David Deaton , O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Los Angeles, California; Poopak Nourafchan and Michael M. Maddigan , Hogan Lovells LLP, Los Angeles, California; David J. Schindler , Latham & Watkins LLP, Los Angeles, California; Anne W. Robinson , Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, D.C.; Paul C. Burkholder , David Jacobs , and Jonah Retzinger , Epstein Becker & Green PC, Los Angeles, California; Pamela A. Stone , Michael J. Daponde , and Anthony R. Eaton , Daponde Szabo Rowe PC, Sacramento, California; for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: Ronald M. Gould and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges, and Jack Zouhary, District Judge.


ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION

The opinion in the above-captioned matter filed on July 9, 2018, and published at 895 F.3d 619, is amended as follows:

At slip opinion page 21, replace the sentence <The complaint details a variety of ways in which the defendant organizations knew, or reasonably should have known, that MedXM's risk adjustment data were invalid.> with <The complaint details a variety of ways in which the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases