CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO. OF MN v. FCC

Nos. 17-2296, 17-2342, 17-2344, 17-2685.

901 F.3d 991 (2018)

CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY OF MINNESOTA, LLC, Petitioner v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION; United States of America, Respondents. Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee; BT Americas, Inc.; Granite Telecommunications, LLC; INCOMPAS; Sprint Corporation; Windstream Services, LLC, Intervenors. Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee; BT Americas, Inc.; Granite Telecommunications, LLC; INCOMPAS; Sprint Corporation; Windstream Services, LLC, Petitioners v. Federal Communications Commission; United States of America, Respondents. NCTA-The Internet & Television Association; Comcast Corporation; AT&T Services, Inc.; USTelecom; CenturyLink, Inc., Intervenors. Consumer Federation of America; New Networks Institute; Public Knowledge, Amici on Behalf of Petitioners CenturyLink, Incorporated, Petitioner v. Federal Communications Commission; United States of America, Respondents Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee; BT Americas, Inc.; Granite Telecommunications, LLC; INCOMPAS; Sprint Corporation; Windstream Services, LLC, Intervenors. Access Point, Inc.; Alpheus Communications, LLC; New Horizons Communications Corp.; XChange Telecom, LLC, Petitioners v. Federal Communications Commission; United States of America, Respondents. NCTA-The Internet & Television Association; Comcast Corporation; AT&T Services, Inc.; USTelecom; CenturyLink, Inc., Intervenors. Consumer Federation of America; New Networks Institute; Public Knowledge, Amici on Behalf of Petitioners.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Filed: August 28, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Counsel who presented argument were: Russell Paul Hanser of Washington, DC for CenturyLink and Citizens Telecommunications Company of Minnesota, LLC; Christopher J. Wright of Washington, DC for Sprint Corporation and Windstream Services, LLC; Matthew J. Dunne of Washington, DC for FCC; Jonathan E. Nuechterlein of Washington, DC for AT&T.

Briefs were filed by the following parties: CENTURYLINK, INC. and CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY OF MINNESOTA, LLC., Russell P. Hanser , Brian W. Murray , Ethan D. Jeans and Melissa L. Turcios of Washington, DC.

GRANITE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC; BT AMERICAS, INC.; and INCOMPAS, Markham Cho Erickson , Washington DC.

WINDSTREAM SERVICES, LLC and SPRINT CORPORATION, Christopher J. Wright , John T. Nakahata , Timothy J. Simeone , H. Henry Shi , and V. Shiva Goel , Washington, DC.

AD HOC TELECOMMUNICATIONS USERS COMMITTEE, Colleen Boothby and Sara Kuehnle , Washington, DC.

ACCESS POINT, INC.; ALPHEUS COMMUNICATIONS, LLC; NEW HORIZONS COMMUNICATIONS CORP.; and XCHANGE TELECOM, LLC, Russesll Blau and Andrew D. Lipman , Washington, DC.

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Robert B. Nicholson and Robert J. Wiggers , U.S. Dept. Of Justice, Antitrust Division, Washington, DC, Sarah E. Citrin and Matthew J. Dunne , FCC, Washington, DC.

AMICI PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE, CONSUMER FEDERATION OF AMERICA, and NEW NETWORKS INSTITUTE, Harold Feld , John Bergmayer , and Philip Berenbroik , PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE, Washington, DC., Bruce Kushnick , NEW NETWORKS INSTITUTE, Brooklyn, NY, Mark Cooper , CONSUMER FEDERATION OF AMERICA, Washington, DC.

INTERVENORS AD HOC ET AL. In support of Respondents, SPRINT COPORATION AND WINDSTREAM SERVICES, LLC, Christopher J. Wright , John T. Nakahata , Timothy J. Simeon , H. Henry Shi , V. Shiva Goel , Washington, DC, BT AMERICAS, INC.; GRANITE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC; and INCOMPAS Markham Cho Erickson , Washington, DC.

CABLE INTERVENORS in Support of the Federal Respondents, Matthew A. Brill , Matthew T. Murchison , Washington, DC, Ryan S. Baasch , New York, NY.

ILEC INTERVENORS in Support of the Federal Respondents, CENTURYLINK, Craig J. Brown , Denver, CO, AT&T and USTELECOM, Jonathan E. Nuechterlein , James P. Young , C. Frederick Beckner, III , Christopher T. Shenk , and Kurt A. Johnson , Washington DC.

Before SHEPHERD, MELLOY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.


Two groups of petitioners ask this Court to review a 2017 order of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") that alters the FCC's regulations for business data services ("BDS"). One group, the "ILEC Petitioners,"1 challenges new price cap rates in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases