CLICK-TO-CALL TECHNOLOGIES v. INGENIO, INC.

2015-1242.

899 F.3d 1321 (2018)

CLICK-TO-CALL TECHNOLOGIES, LP, Appellant v. INGENIO, INC., YELLOWPAGES.COM, LLC, Appellees Andrei Iancu, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Intervenor

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: August 16, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter J. Ayers , Law Office of Peter J. Ayers, Austin, TX, for appellant.

Stanley Joseph Panikowski, III , DLA Piper US LLP, San Diego, CA, argued for all appellees. Appellees Ingenio, Inc., YellowPages.com, LLC represented by Mitchell G. Stockwell , Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA. Appellee YellowPages.com, LLC also represented by David Clay Holloway.

Molly R. Silfen , Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by Sarah E. Craven , Mary L. Kelly , Thomas W. Krause .

Opinion dissenting from footnote 3 of the opinion filed by Circuit Judge Dyk, in which Circuit Judge Lourie joins.


This long-marooned case returns to us after a voyage alongside two others interpreting the scope of 35 U.S.C. § 314(d)'s "No Appeal" provision and its applicability to time-bar determinations under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b): Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. Lee, ___ U.S. ___, 136 S.Ct. 2131

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases