1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. ULTRATEC, INC. v. SORENSON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
 

ULTRATEC, INC. v. SORENSON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

Nos. 2017-1161 and 2017-1225.

ULTRATEC, INC., CAPTEL, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. SORENSON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., CAPTIONCALL, LLC, Defendants-Cross-Appellants

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: May 18, 2018.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

KRISTIN GRAHAM NOEL , Quarles & Brady, LLP, Madison, WI, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by MATTHEW J. DUCHEMIN , MARTHA JAHN SNYDER , ANTHONY ALLEN TOMASELLI .

PRATIK A. SHAH , Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-cross-appellants. Also represented by ZE-WEN JULIUS CHEN , RACHEL J. ELSBY ; MICHAEL P. KAHN , CAITLIN ELIZABETH OLWELL , New York, NY.

Before PROST, DYK and O'MALLEY,

This disposition is nonprecedential.

Plaintiffs Ultratec, Inc. and CapTel, Inc. (collectively, "Ultratec") appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin's judgment as a matter of law after a jury verdict that claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,660,398 ("'398 patent") are invalid as obvious...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases