1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 890 F.3d
  5. 890 F.3d 828 (2018)
 

PLANNED PARENTHOOD v. CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROG.

No. 16-16997.

890 F.3d 828 (2018)

PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC.; Planned Parenthood: Shasta-Diablo, Inc., dba Planned Parenthood Northern California; Planned Parenthood Mar Monte, Inc.; Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest; Planned Parenthood Los Angeles; Planned Parenthood/Orange and San Bernardino Counties, Inc.; Planned Parenthood of Santa Barbara, Ventura and San Luis Obispo Counties, Inc.; Planned Parenthood Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley, Inc.; Planned Parenthood Center for Choice; Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains; Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS; BioMax Procurement Services, LLC; David Daleiden, aka Robert Daoud Sarkis; Sandra Susan Merritt, aka Susan Tennenbaum; Gerardo Adrian Lopez, Defendants-Appellants, and Troy Newman; Phillip S. Cronin; Albin Rhomberg, Defendants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed May 16, 2018.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles S. LiMandri (argued), Paul M. Jonna , Teresa L. Mendoza , and Jeffrey M. Trissell , Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund, Rancho Santa Fe, California; Horatio Mihet (argued), Liberty Counsel, Orlando, Florida; Catherine W. Short , Life Legal Defense Foundation, Ojai, California; Thomas Breicha and Peter Breen , Thomas More Society, Chicago, Illinois; Nicolaie Cocis , Law Office of Nic Cocis and Associates, Murrieta, California; for Defendants-Appellants.

Amy L. Bomse (argued), Stephanie Fine , Jee Young You , Sharon D. Mayo , and Steven L. Mayer , Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, San Francisco, California; Beth H. Parker , Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, Sacramento, California; Helene T. Krasnoff , Planned Parenthood Federation of America; Paul W. Rodney , Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Denver, Colorado; John Robinson , Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Washington, D.C.; for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Concurrence by Judge Gould.

OPINION

Plaintiffs1 sued Defendants2 in the federal district court for the Northern District of California alleging that Defendants had used fraudulent means to enter their conferences and gain meetings with their...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases