COLLIER v. SP PLUS CORP.

No. 17-2431.

889 F.3d 894 (2018)

Kathryn G. COLLIER and Benjamin M. Seitz, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SP PLUS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided May 14, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Micah M. Siegal , Mary E. Lentz , Attorneys, GOTTSCHLICH & PORTUNE, LLP, Dayton, OH, Robert James Pavich , Attorney, Pavich Law Group P.C., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Steven H. Gistenson , Attorney, DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC, Drive Chicago, IL, from Defendant-Appellee.

Before Manion, Hamilton, and Barrett, Circuit Judges.


This case presents an unusual circumstance: both parties insist that the plaintiffs lack Article III standing to sue. They draw opposing conclusions from this premise, however. The plaintiffs say that without standing their case could not be removed from state court using 28 U.S.C. § 1441; the defendant justifies removal but says the case...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases