MARTIN v. U.S.

No. 16-3864.

889 F.3d 827 (2018)

Andrew Charles MARTIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: May 14, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Christian J. Grostic , KUSHNER, HAMED & GROSTIC CO., LPA, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellant. Alejandro A. Abreu , UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Christian J. Grostic , KUSHNER, HAMED & GROSTIC CO., LPA, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellant. Henry F. DeBaggis , UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellee.

Before: GIBBONS, WHITE, and STRANCH, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

Andrew Martin filed a § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence, arguing that his attorneys' ineffective assistance cost him a three-point sentencing reduction for acceptance of responsibility. The district court denied Martin's motion without holding an evidentiary hearing. Because the district...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases