PHILADELPHIA TAXI ASS'N v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES

No. 17-1871.

886 F.3d 332 (2018)

PHILADELPHIA TAXI ASSOCIATION, INC; Aamir Trans., Inc.; Aanyia Trans., Inc.; Abaas Trans., Inc.; Abnik Inc.; Amraan Trans., Inc.; Atma Cab Inc.; Aumbreen; Avinith Brothers Corp.; Bains Transportation, Inc.; Balan Cab Co.; Bam Arg Inc.; Billa Cab Co.; B&M Transport Inc.; Chaudhry Cab Inc.; C.S. Cab Co.; Dashmesh Cab Corp.; Daya Enterprises Inc.; Daya Transportation Inc.; Dhamthal Trans Inc.; Dhesi Cab Co.; E&S Trans Inc.; Golden Temple Corp.; Guru Cab Co.; Guru Trans., Inc.; Gurveer Cab Co.; Harry Dillion Cab Co.; H Bhatti; H&J Cab Co.; HSP Cab Co.; Inder Transport Inc.; I&S, Magassa Inc.; Jai Luxmi Inc.; Jen-Kho Trans.; JFK Transit Inc.; JRK Cab Co.; J.K.P. Transport, Inc.; J&H Cab Co.; Kamal D Inc.; Kashif Corp.; Kejsi & Au Lona Cab Co.; Khadim Trans Inc.; Khayyam Inc.; Khkhoar Taxi Cab; Khokha Group USA; KM Taxi, Inc.; K Singh Cab, Inc.; Maher Cab Co.; Manna S. Inc.; M&M Trans Inc.; Nasrin Trans Inc.; Navid Inc.; Navjot Cab Company; Njjar Cab Co.; One Cab Inc.; Parveen Transport Inc.; Prabh Inc.; Pun Jab Corp.; P.K. Cab; Raja Cab Co.; Rajdeep Cab Inc.; Ramtin Inc.; Rasul Corp.; Saas Cab Co.; Sahota Cab Co.; Sanaz, Inc.; Sardar Cab Co.; Setareh Cab Co.; Shaad Cab Inc.; Shawn Limo; Shivam Cab Corp.; Singh Maan Inc.; T.S. Malhi Cab Co.; Zadeh Inc.; Zahd Trans Inc.; Zari Cab Co.; Panthea, Inc.; Pars Transport, Inc.; City Car Transport, Inc.; Phila Transport, Inc., Appellants v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Opinion Filed: March 27, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. Innelli [ARGUED], Two Penn Center, Suite 1300, Philadelphia, PA 19102, Stephen R. Bolden , Fell & Spalding, 100 South Broad Street, 2230 Land Title Building, Philadelphia, PA 19110, Counsel for Appellants.

Steven A. Reed [ARGUED], R. Brendan Fee , Morgan Lewis & Bockius, 1701 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103, Brian C. Rocca , Sujal J. Shah , Morgan Lewis & Bockius, One Market, Spear Street Tower, San Francisco, CA 94105, Counsel for Appellee.

Before: AMBRO, KRAUSE, and RENDELL, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

Philadelphia taxicab drivers, aggrieved by the influx of taxis hailed at the touch of an app on one's phone, brought this antitrust action to protest the entry of Appellee Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Uber") into the Philadelphia taxicab market. The Philadelphia Taxi Association ("PTA"), along with 80 individual...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases