OTTAH v. FIAT CHRYSLER

2017-1842.

884 F.3d 1135 (2018)

Chikezie OTTAH, Plaintiff-Appellant v. FIAT CHRYSLER, Toyota, Nissan Motors Co. Limited, Hyundai Motor America, Ford Motor Company, Jaguar Land Rover North America, General Motors LLC, Kia Motors America, Inc., Defendants-Appellees Daimler AG (Mercedes Benz), Citroën/Peugeot Motor Company Arness Paris 6 City, Mitsubishi Motor Corporation, BMW Motor Corporation, Rolls Royce Corporation, Mazda Motor, Suburu Motor Corporation, Defendant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: March 7, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

CHIKEZIE OTTAH, Brooklyn, NY, pro se.

FRANK C. CIMINO, JR. , Venable LLP, Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee Fiat Chrysler. Also represented by MEGAN S. WOODWORTH ; TODD M. NOSHER , New York, NY.

PETER THOMAS EWALD , Oliff PLC, Alexandria, VA, for defendant-appellee Toyota. Also represented by JOHN W. O'MEARA , JAMES OLIFF.

REGINALD J. HILL , Jenner & Block LLP, Chicago, IL, for defendant-appellee Nissan Motors Co. Limited. Also represented by PETER J. BRENNAN.

JUN-SUK PARK , Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee Hyundai Motor America. Also represented by JAMES ALEXANDER KAISER ; NICHOLAS LEE , Los Angeles, CA.

JASON R. MUDD , Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS, for defendant-appellee Ford Motor Company. Also represented by ERIC ALLAN BURESH.

MATTHEW J. MOORE , Lathan & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee Jaguar Land Rover North America. Also represented by GABRIEL BELL ; CLEMENT J. NAPLES , New York, NY.

MARK MICHAEL SUPKO , Crowell & Moring, LLP, Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee General Motors LLC. Also represented by SCOTT BITTMAN , New York, NY.

DANIEL GRUNFELD , Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant-appellee Kia Motors America, Inc. Also represented by JASON EVAN GETTLEMAN , MICHAEL JOHN LYONS , JACOB JOSEPH ORION MINNE , Palo Alto, CA.

Before Newman, Hughes, and Stoll, Circuit Judges.


Chikezie Ottah (herein "Ottah") appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.1 The district court granted summary judgment of non-infringement to several defendant automobile companies with respect to U.S. Patent No. 7,152,840 ("the '840 Patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases