1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 880 F.3d
  5. 880 F.3d 620 (2018)
 

KLIPSCH GROUP, INC. v. EPRO E-COMMERCE LTD.

Docket Nos. 16-3637-cv, 16-3726-cv August Term, 2017.

880 F.3d 620 (2018)

KLIPSCH GROUP, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, ABC, Plaintiff, v. EPRO E-COMMERCE LIMITED, DBA DealExtreme, DBA Dealextreme.com, DBA DX, DBA Dx.com, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, Def; Big Box Store Limited, DBA Bigboxstore.com, DBA Bigboxsave.com; Zhongren Cao, DBA United Pacific Connections Company, DBA Atechport.com, DBA Wirelessspycamera.biz; Dandan Wu, DBA Pandawill.com; D201.Com, AKA PhoneII.com, AKA SinoPro.com; Shang Tao, DBA Pingu International Limited, DBA Airaccent.com; Shiming Zhang, DBA Best Discount Store; Kingspec SSD, DBA EEEPCSSD.com; EZU Energy Limited, DBA Beebond Co., DBA Beebond.com, DBA James Collen, DBA Beebond.co.UK; Mag Simon, DBA Bulkordering.com; McBub.com, AKA Sinadeal.com; Li Jin, DBA Kan72D7GB; Alex Chaow, DBA Advanced Plus Int'l Share Ltd., DBA Superluckymart.com; Yaoyao Mai, DBA Shenzhen Taobaodao Technology Co., Ltd.; Eachgame International (HK) Stock Co., Ltd., DBA Eachgame.com; Technoplus International Co., Limited, DBA Sertec, DBA SZSertec.com, DBA Dealingsmart.com; Yuedajie888999; Escalongtb, AKA Guderianygm; GH6G8YUH6; Zhaohua Luo, AKA Xu Yong Luo, DBA wholesalewill.com; XYZ Companies, 1-10; John Does 1-10; Jane Does 1-10, Defendants.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided: January 25, 2018.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G. ROXANNE ELINGS ( L. Danielle Toaltoan , George Wukoson , on the brief), Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.

JOHN A. BASINGER , Saul Ewing LLP, Newark, NJ ( Hugh H. Mo , Pedro M. Medina , Law Firm of Hugh H. Mo, P.C., New York, NY, and Steven C. Bennett , Park Jensen Bennett LLP, New York, NY, on the brief), for Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.

Before: Jacobs and Lynch, Circuit Judges, and Crotty, District Judge.

In the course of defending against claims that it sold counterfeit products, defendant-appellant ePRO E-Commerce Limited ("ePRO") engaged in persistent discovery misconduct: it failed to timely disclose the majority of the responsive documents in its possession, restricted a discovery vendor's access to its electronic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases