U.S. v. ESPINOZA

No. 16-50033.

880 F.3d 506 (2018)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Angelica Urias ESPINOZA, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed January 22, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Marks (argued), Federal Public Defenders of San Diego Inc., San Diego, California, for Defendant-Appellant.

Colin M. McDonald (argued), Assistant United States Attorney; Helen H. Hong , Chief, Appellate Section; Laura E. Duffy , United States Attorney; United States Attorney's Office, San Diego, California; for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before: Richard A. Paez, Marsha S. Berzon, and Morgan Christen, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

Angelica Urias Espinoza appeals her conviction for importation of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We consider whether the district court abused its discretion in excluding evidence of third-party culpability.1 As the district court applied the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases