1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 876 F.3d
  5. 876 F.3d 1350 (2017)
 

ARCTIC CAT v. BOMBARDIER RECREATIONAL PRODUCTS

2017-1475.

876 F.3d 1350 (2017)

ARCTIC CAT INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. BOMBARDIER RECREATIONAL PRODUCTS INC., BRP U.S. Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: December 7, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

JOHN A. DRAGSETH , Fish & Richardson P.C., Minneapolis, MN, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by NICHOLAS STEPHAN BOEBEL , Populus Law LLC, Minneapolis, MN; NIALL ANDREW MACLEOD , AARON MYERS , DIANE PETERSON , Kutak Rock LLP, Minneapolis, MN.

WILLIAM F. LEE , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA, argued for defendants-appellants. Also represented by JENNIFER JASMINE JOHN , MICHELLE LISZT SANDALS , LOUIS W. TOMPROS .

Before Moore, Plager, and Stoll, Circuit Judges.

Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. and BRP U.S. Inc. (collectively, "BRP") appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida's denial of judgment as a matter of law that the asserted claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,568,969 ("'969 patent") and 6,793,545 ("'545 patent") would have been obvious...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases