1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 875 F.3d
  5. 875 F.3d 321 (2017)
 

WATKINS v. HONEYWELL INTERN. INC.

No. 17-3032.

875 F.3d 321 (2017)

Ann WATKINS; James Ulicny, for themselves and others similarly-situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: November 8, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: William Wertheimer , LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM WERTHEIMER, Bingham Farms, Michigan, for Appellants. K. Winn Allen , KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. ON BRIEF: William Wertheimer , LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM WERTHEIMER, Bingham Farms, Michigan, Stuart M. Israel , John G. Adam , LEGGHIO & ISRAEL, P.C., for Appellants. K. Winn Allen , Craig S. Primis, P.C., Matthew P. Downer , KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before: COLE, Chief Judge; ROGERS and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

This is a too-familiar story. For almost 40 years, Honeywell International (or its predecessors) operated a manufacturing plant in Fostoria, Ohio. Many union workers, including Ann Watkins and James Ulicny, spent most of their working years at the plant. They retired...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases