UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Rufino PERALTA-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Filed August 22, 2017.
Filed August 22, 2017.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Michelle Wasserman , Assistant U.S. Attorney, Helen H. Hong , Assistant U.S. Attorney, David Daniel Leshner , Assistant U.S. Attorney, Colin M. McDonald , Assistant U.S. Attorney, US Department of Justice, Southern District of California, Suite # 6293, 880 Front Street, San Diego, CA 92101, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Kara Hartzler , Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Suite 900, 225 Broadway, San Diego, CA 92101-5030, for Defendant-Appellant.
David Lee Menninger , Deputy Federal Public Defender, FPDCA-Federal Public Defender's Office (Los Angeles), 321 East Second Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012-4202, for Amicus Curiae NINTH CIRCUIT FEDERAL PUBLIC AND COMMUNITY DEFENDERS.
Laura McClure St. John , Attorney, Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project, P.O. Box 654, 2601 N. Hwy 79, Florence, AZ 85132, for Amicus Curiae NONPROFIT IMMIGRATION ORGANIZATIONS AND LAW SCHOOL IMMIGRATION CLINICS.
Mark H. Lynch , Covington & Burling LLP, One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street NW, Washington, DC 20001-4956, for Amicus Curiae LAW PROFESSORS.
Kari Elisabeth Hong , Attorney, Boston College Law School, 885 Centre Street, Newton, MA 02459, Stephen William Manning, IMMIGRANT LAW GROUP PC, P.O. Box 40103, Portland, OR 97240, for Amicus Curiae LAW PROFESSORS, IMMIGRATION SCHOLARS, AND CLINICIANS.
Stephen B. Kang , ACLU Foundation of Northern California, 39 Drumm Street, San Francisco, CA 94111, for Amicus Curiae ACLU IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS PROJECT, ACLU OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; ACLU OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA; ACLU OF SAN DIEGO & IMPERIAL COUNTIES; AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL and NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD.
Christopher Hajec , CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, Suite 300, 1233 20th St. NW, Washington, DC 20036, for Amicus Curiae IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE.
Before: Harry Pregerson, Jay S. Bybee, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
ORDER
Appellant's petition for panel rehearing is hereby GRANTED.
The opinion and dissent filed February 7, 2017, Nos. 14-50393 and 14-50394, and appearing at 847 F.3d 1124, are withdrawn. It shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
A memorandum disposition is being simultaneously filed with this order. Judge Pregerson concurs in the judgment.
No further petitions...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
