1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 865 F.3d
  5. 865 F.3d 1348 (2017)
 

HONEYWELL INT'L v. MEXICHEM AMANCO HOLDING

2016-1996.

865 F.3d 1348 (2017)

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., Appellant v. MEXICHEM AMANCO HOLDING S.A. DE C.V., Daikin Industries, Ltd., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: August 1, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

GREGG F. LOCASCIO , Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by WILLIAM H. BURGESS , NOAH SAMUEL FRANK ; JOSEPH MICHAEL SKERPON , Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., Washington, DC.

JOSEPH A. KROMHOLZ , Ryan, Kromholz & Manion, S.C., Milwaukee, WI, argued for appellee Mexichem Amanco Holding S.A. de C.V. Also represented by PATRICK J. FLEIS.

ANTHONY F. LO CICERO , Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee Daikin Industries, Ltd. Also represented by MARION P. METELSKI.

Before Lourie, Reyna, and Wallach, Circuit Judges.

Honeywell International, Inc. ("Honeywell") appeals from a decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("the PTO") Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("the Board") affirming the Examiner's rejection, in two merged inter partes reexaminations, of claims 1-26, 31-37, 46-49, 58, 59, 61-68, 70-75, 80, and 81 of U.S. Patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases