MULL v. MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN

No. 15-56246.

865 F.3d 1207 (2017)

Danielle MULL, appointed Guardian Ad Litem for C. Mull; C. Mull, as Plaintiff and Danielle Mull is Appointed Guardian Ad Litem for C. Mull, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Lenai Mull; Norman Mull, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees, v. MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN, Defendant-Appellant, Board of Directors of Motion Picture Industry Health Plan, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed August 1, 2017.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kathryn Jane Halford (argued) and Elizabeth Rosenfeld , Wohlner Kaplon Cutler Halford & Rosenfeld, Encino, California, for Defendants-Appellants.

Donald Mitchell de Camara (argued), Law Office of Donald M. de Camara, Carlsbad, California; Drew M. Widders and Daniel E. Wilcoxen , Wilcoxen Callahan LLP, Sacramento, California; for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Before: Susan P. Graber and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges, and Susan R. Bolton, District Judge.


This appeal arises from the order of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of Plaintiffs Norman, Danielle, Lenai, and C. Mull on claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA") against Defendants Motion Picture Industry Health Plan (the "Plan") and the Board of Directors of the Plan...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases