1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 857 F.3d
  5. 857 F.3d 1347 (2017)
 

HALO ELECTRONICS v. PULSE ELECTRONICS

2016-2006.

857 F.3d 1347 (2017)

HALO ELECTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. PULSE ELECTRONICS, INC., fka Pulse Engineering, Inc., Pulse Electronics Corporation, fka Technitrol, Inc., Defendants-Appellants

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: May 26, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

CRAIG E. COUNTRYMAN , Fish & Richardson, PC, San Diego, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by MICHAEL J. KANE , WILLIAM WOODFORD , JOHN A. DRAGSETH , Minneapolis, MN.

MARK LEE HOGGE , Dentons US LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants. Also represented by SHAILENDRA K. MAHESHWARI , RAJESH CHARLES NORONHA , NICHOLAS HUNT JACKSON.

Before Lourie, Moore, and Hughes, Circuit Judges.

Pulse Electronics, Inc. and Pulse Electronics Corporation (together, "Pulse") appeal from the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada awarding Halo Electronics, Inc. ("Halo") prejudgment interest. See Halo Elecs., Inc. v. Pulse Elecs., Inc., No. 2:07-cv-00331-APG-PAL, slip op. (D. Nev...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases