CARLSON v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP.

No. 15-2440.

856 F.3d 320 (2017)

Martha CARLSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Romona Winebarger; Rex Winebarger, Plaintiffs, v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided: May 9, 2017.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: William Louis Hurlock , MUELLER LAW, PLLC, Montclair, New Jersey, for Appellant. Daniel Brandon Rogers , SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P., Miami, Florida, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Andres C. Pereira , Rachael K. Jones , David Martin , MUELLER LAW, PLLC, Austin, Texas, for Appellant. Leslie C. Packer , ELLIS & WINTERS LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Thacker wrote the opinion, in which Judge Duncan and Judge Keenan joined.


After her doctor prescribed and implanted a transvaginal mesh product that Boston Scientific Corporation ("Appellee") manufactured, Martha Carlson ("Appellant") sued the company, alleging that the mesh injured her and that Appellee failed to warn of risks associated with the mesh. After joining a Multidistrict Litigation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases