1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 851 F.3d
  5. 851 F.3d 1329 (2017)
 

U.S. v. FRY

No. 15-3062.

851 F.3d 1329 (2017)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Daniel FRY, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided March 31, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Alan Olshonsky, Washington, DC, appointed by the court, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

David P. Saybolt, Assistant U.S. Attorney, argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief were Elizabeth Trosman and John P. Mannarino, Assistant U.S. Attorneys.

Before: Griffith, Srinivasan, and Millett, Circuit Judges.

Daniel Fry pleaded guilty to one count of possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B). On appeal, Fry raises procedural and substantive challenges to the sentence imposed against him by the district court. His arguments principally revolve around the proposition that the district court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases