AIR EVAC EMS v. TEXAS, DEPT. OF INS. DIV. OF WORK

No. 16-51023.

851 F.3d 507 (2017)

AIR EVAC EMS, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellant v. State of TEXAS, DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION; David Mattax, Texas Commissioner of Insurance, in his official capacity; Ryan Brannan, Texas Commissioner of Workers' Compensation, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees v. Texas Mutual Insurance Company; Liberty Mutual Insurance Company; Zenith Insurance Company; Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company; Twin City Fire Insurance Company; Transportation Insurance Company; Valley Forge Insurance Company; Truck Insurance Exchange, Intervenor Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

FILED March 20, 2017.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joshua Lee Fuchs , Houston, TX, Thomas F. Allen, Jr. , Dallas, TX, Jones Day, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Lisa Bennett , Assistant Solicitor General, Jennifer Settle Jackson , Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Texas, Austin, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.

Matthew Birk Baumgartner , Boyce C. Cabaniss, Esq. , Karen Shafrir Vladeck , Graves, Dougherty, Hearon & Moody, P.C., Paul W. Schlaud , Reeves & Brightwell, L.L.P., Austin, TX, for Intervenor Defendant-Appellee Texas Mutual Insurance Company.

Robert F. Josey , David Lawrence Plaut, Esq. , Hanna & Plaut, L.L.P., Austin, TX, for Intervenor Defendant-Appellee Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.

James Michael Loughlin , Stone Loughlin & Swanson, L.L.P., Austin, TX, for Intervenor Defendants-Appellees Zenith Insurance Company, Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, Twin City Fire Insurance Company, Transportation Insurance Company, Valley Forge Insurance Company, Truck Insurance Exchange.

George W. Hicks, Jr. , Kirkland & Ellis, L.L.P., George W. Hicks, Jr. , Bancroft, P.L.L.C., Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae Air Methods Corporation.

Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.


Primarily at issue is whether an airambulance company, claiming federal preemption of Texas' workers'-compensation scheme, satisfies the equitable exception to the Eleventh Amendment, as provided in Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123, 155-56, 28 S.Ct. 441, 52 L.Ed. 714 (1908...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases