DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED; Second Amendment Foundation, Incorporated, Plaintiffs-Appellants
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE; John F. Kerry, In His Official Capacity as the Secretary of the Department of State; Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, Department of State Bureau of Political Military Affairs; Kenneth B. Handelman, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Defense Trade Controls in the Bureau of Political-Military Affairs; C. Edward Peartree, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the Director of the Office of Defense Trade Controls Policy Division; Sarah J. Heidema, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as the Division Chief, Regulatory and Multilateral Affairs, Office of Defense Trade Controls Policy; Glenn Smith, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the Senior Advisor, Office of Defense Trade Controls, Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Bruce D. Brown , Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Washington, DC, Amicus Curiae for REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, THOMAS JEFFERSON CENTER FOR THE PROTECTION OF FREE EXPRESSION.
Raffi Melkonian , Wright & Close, L.L.P., Houston, TX, Amicus Curiae for REPRESENTATIVE THOMAS MASSIE, REPRESENTATIVE BRIAN BABIN, REPRESENTATIVE K. MIKE CONAWAY, REPRESENTATIVE JEFF DUNCAN, REPRESENTATIVE BLAKE FARENTHOLD, REPRESENTATIVE JOHN FLEMING, REPRESENTATIVE PAUL GOSAR, REPRESENTATIVE WALTER JONES, MIKE KELLY, REPRESENTATIVE STEVE KING, REPRESENTATIVE RAUL LABRADOR, REPRESENTATIVE JEFF MILLER, REPRESENTATIVE BILL POSEY, REPRESENTATIVE TODD ROKITA, REPRESENTATIVE DANIEL WEBSTER.
Robert E. Henneke , Texas Public Policy Foundation, Austin, TX, Amicus Curiae for TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION.
Before DAVIS, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
W. EUGENE DAVIS, UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE.
The Court having been polled at the request of one of its members, and a majority of the judges who are in regular service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. R. App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35), the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED. In the en banc poll, five judges voted in favor...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.