Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
MEREDITH MARTIN ADDY , Tabet DiVito & Rothstein, LLC, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by ASHLEY CRETTOL INSALACO , DANIEL I. KONIECZNY.
ANDREW PAUL ZAGER , Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER , JOHN J. FARGO.
KURT CALLA , Covington & Burling LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for third party defendant-appellee. Also represented by JOHN ARTHUR KELLY , MATTHEW AARON KUDZIN , RANGANATH SUDARSHAN , Washington, DC.
JEFFREY A. LAMKEN , MoloLamken LLP, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae BSA The Software Alliance. Also represented by MICHAEL GREGORY PATTILLO, JR.
Before Moore, Wallach, and Stoll, Circuit Judges.
Moore, Circuit Judge.
Thales Visionix, Inc. ("TVI") appeals from the U.S. Court of Federal Claims ("Claims Court") judgment on the pleadings holding that claims 1-5, 11-13, 20, 22-26, 32-34, and 41 of U.S. Patent No. 6,474,159 ("'159 patent") are directed to patent-ineligible subject matter. Thales Visionix, Inc. v. United States, 122 Fed...
NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.
Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.
As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.