850 F.3d 1343 (2017)

THALES VISIONIX INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee Elbit Systems of America, LLC, Third Party Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: March 8, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

MEREDITH MARTIN ADDY , Tabet DiVito & Rothstein, LLC, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by ASHLEY CRETTOL INSALACO , DANIEL I. KONIECZNY.

ANDREW PAUL ZAGER , Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER , JOHN J. FARGO.

KURT CALLA , Covington & Burling LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for third party defendant-appellee. Also represented by JOHN ARTHUR KELLY , MATTHEW AARON KUDZIN , RANGANATH SUDARSHAN , Washington, DC.

JEFFREY A. LAMKEN , MoloLamken LLP, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae BSA The Software Alliance. Also represented by MICHAEL GREGORY PATTILLO, JR.

Before Moore, Wallach, and Stoll, Circuit Judges.

Thales Visionix, Inc. ("TVI") appeals from the U.S. Court of Federal Claims ("Claims Court") judgment on the pleadings holding that claims 1-5, 11-13, 20, 22-26, 32-34, and 41 of U.S. Patent No. 6,474,159 ("'159 patent") are directed to patent-ineligible subject matter. Thales Visionix, Inc. v. United States, 122 Fed...

Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases