OKAFOR v. U.S.

No. 14-17087.

846 F.3d 337 (2017)

Chike OKAFOR, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed January 13, 2017.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward M. Burch (argued) and David M. Michael , Law Offices of David M. Michael, San Francisco, California, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Anne M. Voights (argued), Assistant United States Attorney; Barbara J. Valliere , Chief, Appellate Division; Melinda Haag , United States Attorney; United States Attorney's Office, San Francisco, California; for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: A. Wallace Tashima and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges, and Edward R. Korman, District Judge.


OPINION

Chike Okafor appeals the decision of the district court denying his motion for return of property. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm the district court's ruling.

In 2013, at San Francisco International...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases