1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 844 F.3d
  5. 844 F.3d 909 (2016)
 

HAMMOND v. STAMPS.COM, INC.

No. 16-2243.

844 F.3d 909 (2016)

Elizabeth HAMMOND, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STAMPS.COM, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Filed December 20, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Seth E. Pierce of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp, LLP, Los Angeles, California ( Gilbert S. Lee of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp, LLP, Los Angeles, California, and Andrew G. Schultz of Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, P.A., Albuquerque, New Mexico, with him on the briefs), for Defendant-Appellant.

Sid Childress , Sante Fe, New Mexico, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before KELLY, GORSUCH, and McHUGH, Circuit Judges.

The Class Action Fairness Act promises a federal forum for proposed class actions if (among other things) the amount "in controversy" exceeds $5 million. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2). But though it has made appearances in many and even pretty ancient federal jurisdictional statutes, the term "in controversy" remains a source...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases