1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 844 F.3d
  5. 844 F.3d 909 (2016)
 

HAMMOND v. STAMPS.COM, INC.

No. 16-2243.

844 F.3d 909 (2016)

Elizabeth HAMMOND, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STAMPS.COM, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Filed December 20, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Seth E. Pierce of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp, LLP, Los Angeles, California ( Gilbert S. Lee of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp, LLP, Los Angeles, California, and Andrew G. Schultz of Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, P.A., Albuquerque, New Mexico, with him on the briefs), for Defendant-Appellant.

Sid Childress , Sante Fe, New Mexico, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before KELLY, GORSUCH, and McHUGH, Circuit Judges.

The Class Action Fairness Act promises a federal forum for proposed class actions if (among other things) the amount "in controversy" exceeds $5 million. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2). But though it has made appearances in many and even pretty ancient federal jurisdictional statutes, the term "in controversy" remains a source...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases