Dr. Rahinah IBRAHIM, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; Jeh Johnson, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; Terrorist Screening Center; Christopher M. Piehota, in his official capacity as Director of the Terrorist Screening Center; Federal Bureau of Investigation; James Comey, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General, in her official capacity as Attorney General; Andrew G. McCabe, in his official capacity as Executive Assistant Director of the FBI's National Security Branch; National Counterterrorism Center; Nicholas Rasmussen, in his official capacity as Director of the National Counterterrorism Center; Department of State; John Kerry, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; United States of America, Defendant-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted June 14, 2016 San Francisco, California.
Joshua Waldman (argued) and Sharon Swingle , Attorneys, Appellate Staff; Melinda Haag , United States Attorney; Benjamin C. Mizer , Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General; Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Defendants-Appellees.
Chet A. Kronenberg and JoAnne S. Jennings , Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Amici Curiae American Civil Liberties Union of California, Asian Americans Advancing Justice-Asian Law Caucus, Asian Americans Advancing Justice-Los Angeles, Center for Constitutional Rights, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and National Immigration Law Center.
Before: Richard R. Clifton and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges, and Royce C. Lamberth, Senior District Judge.
OPINION
LAMBERTH, Senior District Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant Dr. Rahinah Ibrahim appeals the district court's award of attorney's fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 and the Supreme Court's decision in Hensley v. Eckerhart,461 U.S. 424, 103...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.