DEMER v. IBM CORP. LTD PLAN

No. 13-17196.

835 F.3d 893 (2016)

Daniel G. DEMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IBM CORPORATION LTD PLAN; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed August 26, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michelle L. Roberts (argued), Roberts Bartolic LLP, Alameda, California; Barry Kirschner (argued), Waterfall, Economidis, Caldwell, Hanshaw & Villamana, P.C., Tucson, Arizona; for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Michelle McAloon Constandse (argued), Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Irvine, California; James K. Mackie , Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Tucson, Arizona, for Defendants-Appellees.

Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Bybee.


OPINION

Plaintiff-Appellant Daniel G. Demer filed suit, pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), against Defendants-Appellees IBM Corporation LTD Plan (the "Plan") and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company ("MetLife"). Mr. Demer claimed that MetLife, the claim administrator and insurer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases