1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 832 F.3d
  5. 832 F.3d 962 (2016)
 

DAVIS v. HOLLINS LAW

No. 14-16437.

832 F.3d 962 (2016)

Michael DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HOLLINS LAW, a Professional Corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed August 8, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kathleen Mary Kushi Carter (argued) and Tamara M. Heathcote , Hollins Law, Irvine, California, for Defendant-Appellant.

Aaron D. Radbil (argued), Greenwald Davidson Radbil PLLC, Austin, Texas; Ryan S. Lee , Krohn & Moss, LTD, Los Angeles, California; Matthew A. Rosenthal , Westgate Law, Los Angeles, California; for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before: Stephen S. Trott, Sandra S. Ikuta, and Paul J. Watford, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

Hollins Law, a law firm and debt collection agency, is subject to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), which among other things requires debt collectors "to disclose in subsequent communications that the communication is from a debt collector." 15 U.S.C. § 1692e(11). Today we hold that if a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases