1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 829 F.3d
  5. 829 F.3d 760 (2016)
 

PERRY v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BD.

No. 14-1155.

829 F.3d 760 (2016)

Anthony W. PERRY, Petitioner v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided July 22, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rebecca Taibleson , Washington, DC, appointed by the court, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs were Devin S. Anderson and Christopher Landau , Washington, DC, all appointed by the court.

Anthony W. Perry, pro se, filed the brief for petitioner.

Stephen W. Fung , Attorney, Merit Systems Protection Board, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before: Griffith, Srinivasan and Millett, Circuit Judges.

When a federal agency takes a significant adverse employment action against an employee, the employee can appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board. If the Board then rules against the employee, she can seek review of the Board's decision in a federal court. But which federal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases