1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 823 F.3d
  5. 823 F.3d 1375 (2016)
 

PROFECTUS TECHNOLOGY v. HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO.

2015-1016, 2015-1018, 2015-1019.

823 F.3d 1375 (2016)

PROFECTUS TECHNOLOGY LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD., Huawei Technologies USA, Inc., Huawei Device USA, Inc., Futurewei Technologies, Inc., Defendants Dell Inc., Apple Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Motorola Mobility LLC, Hewlett-Packard Company, Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: May 26, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

THOMAS C. WRIGHT , Cunningham Swaim, LLP, Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by STEVEN EDWARD ROSS , Ross IP Group PLLC, Dallas, TX.

LAUREN B. FLETCHER , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA, argued for defendant-appellee Apple Inc. Also represented by WILLIAM F. LEE , KEVIN M. YURKERWICH ; BRITTANY BLUEITT AMADI , Washington, DC.

AHMED JAMAL DAVIS , Fish & Richardson, P.C., Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Also represented by MICHAEL J. McKEON ; JOHN STEPHEN GOETZ , New York, NY.

ROGER FULGHUM , Baker Botts, LLP, Houston, TX, for defendant-appellee Dell Inc. Also represented by MICHAEL HAWES , TAMMY PENNINGTON RHODES.

JONATHAN E. RETSKY , Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL, for defendant-appellee Motorola Mobility LLC. Also represented by KURT A. MATHAS , IVAN MICHAEL POULLAOS ; ANDREW RYAN SOMMER , Washington, DC.

NICKOLAS BOHL , Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson LLP, Menlo Park, CA, for defendants-appellees Hewlett-Packard Company, Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Also represented by MARGARET ELIZABETH DAY.

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge MOORE.

Profectus Technology LLC ("Profectus") appeals a district court's claim construction order and grant of summary judgment of non-infringement. The patent-in-suit is directed to a mountable digital picture frame for displaying digital images. Profectus asserted certain of the patent claims against manufacturers and sellers of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases