1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 821 F.3d
  5. 821 F.3d 1 (2016)
 

U.S. v. SCURRY

Nos. 12-3104, 12-3105, 12-3109, 13-3055, 13-3068.

821 F.3d 1 (2016)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Eric SCURRY, also known as E, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided April 8, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan S. Zucker , appointed by the court, argued the cause for appellants Robert Savoy, et al. Dennis M. Hart , appointed by the court, argued the cause for appellant Eric Scurry. With them on the joint brief were Pleasant S. Brodnax III , Howard B. Katzoff , and Mark Diamond , all appointed by the court.

Daniel J. Lenerz , Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, argued the cause for appellee. On the brief were Vincent H. Cohen Jr. , Acting U.S. Attorney, and Elizabeth Trosman , David B. Goodhand , and Arvind K. Lal , Assistant U.S. Attorneys. Elizabeth H. Danello , Assistant U.S. Attorney, entered an appearance.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.

The principal question presented in this appeal is whether Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 mandates suppression of evidence derived from a wiretap where information expressly required by the statute was omitted from the court order authorizing the wiretap. Appellants contend that the district...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases