1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 815 F.3d
  5. 815 F.3d 1173 (2016)
 

SHOUCHEN YANG v. LYNCH

No. 12-71773.

815 F.3d 1173 (2016)

SHOUCHEN YANG, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed February 26, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Certified Law Students Ronald Park (argued) and Emily Cross (argued), supervised by Kathryn M. Davis and Peter R. Afrasiabi ; University of California, Irvine School of Law; Irvine, CA, for Petitioner.

Jonathan Robbins (argued), Jennifer R. Khouri , and Jennifer P. Levings , Office of Immigration Litigation; Benjamin C. Mizer , Civil Division; U.S. Department of Justice; Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Opinion by Judge CHHABRIA; Dissent by Judge SCHROEDER.

OPINION

This court has held that an immigration judge may use the maxim falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus—"false in one thing, false in everything"—to find that a witness who testified falsely in one respect at a removal hearing is also not credible...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases