SYNOPSYS, INC. v. LEE

No. 2015-1183.

812 F.3d 1076 (2016)

SYNOPSYS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. Michelle K. LEE, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property, United States Patent And Trademark Office, Mentor Graphics Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 10, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert M. Loeb , Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by Eric A. Shumsky , Jeremy Peterman ; Indra Neel Chatterjee , Menlo Park, CA; Andrew D. Silverman , New York, NY.

Melissa N. Patterson , Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees Michelle K. Lee, United States Patent and Trademark Office. Also represented by Benjamin C. Mizer , Dana J. Boente , Mark R. Freeman ; David Moskowitz , Office of the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria, VA; Nathan K. Kelley , Jamie Lynne Simpson , Scott Weidenfeller , Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA.

Robert Allen Long, JR. , Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee Mentor Graphics Corporation. Also represented by Kevin F. King ; Bradley Charles Wright , Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., Washington, DC.

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge DYK. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.


Synopsys, Inc. ("Synopsys") brought a suit in district court under the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA") seeking to invalidate the Patent and Trademark Office's ("PTO") regulation that allows the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("the Board") to institute inter partes review on "all or some of the challenged claims" 37 C.F.R...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases