1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 808 F.3d
  5. 808 F.3d 518 (2015)
 

APPLE INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.

No. 2014-1802.

808 F.3d 518 (2015)

APPLE INC., A California Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A Korean Corporation, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., A New York Corporation, Samsung Telecommunications America, Llc, A Delaware Limited Liability Company, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

December 16, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William F. Lee , Andrew J. Danford , Mark Christopher Fleming , Lauren B. Fletcher , Sarah R. Frazier, Esq. , Richard Wells O'Neill, Esq. , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA, Rachel Krevans , Christopher Robinson , Nathaniel Bryan Sabri , Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA, Erik Jeffrey Olson, Esq. , Litigation Counsel, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Palo Alto, CA, James Quarles, III , Thomas Gregory Sprankling , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, DC, Mark D. Selwyn , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale And Dorr LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Kathleen M. Sullivan , William Adams , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, N.Y., Brian Cosmo Cannon , Kevin P.B. Johnson , Senior Trial Attorney, Victoria Fishman Maroulis, Esq. , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, John B. Quinn , Scott L. Watson , Michael Thomas Zeller , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Kevin Alexander Smith , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK, MOORE, O'MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, TARANTO, CHEN, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Appellees Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. filed a petition for rehearing en banc. A response to the petition was invited by the court and filed by appellant Apple Inc. The petition and response were first referred to the panel that heard the appeal and a majority of the panel granted the petition for the limited purpose of amending the court's opinion. Thereafter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases