1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 807 F.3d
  5. 807 F.3d 1353 (2015)
 

PROLITEC, INC. v. SCENTAIR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

No. 2015-1020.

807 F.3d 1353 (2015)

PROLITEC, INC., Appellant, v. SCENTAIR TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

December 4, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Erika Arner , Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Reston, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by J. Derek McCorquindale ; Cory C. Bell , Boston, MA.

David Clay Holloway , Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellee. Also represented by Renae Wainwright ; Joshua B. Pond , Washington, DC; Adam Howard Charnes , Winston-Salem, NC.

Farheena Yasmeen Rasheed , Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee . Also represented by Nathan K. Kelley , Scott Weidenfeller .

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.

This appeal arises from the inter partes review ("IPR") of U.S. Patent No. 7,712,-683 ("'683 patent") owned by Prolitec, Inc. The United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("Board") concluded that both of the claims in the '683 patent were unpatentable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases