1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 808 F.3d
  5. 808 F.3d 1313 (2015)
 

ADVANCED STEEL RECOVERY, LLC v. X-BODY EQUIPMENT

No. 2014-1829.

808 F.3d 1313 (2015)

ADVANCED STEEL RECOVERY, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. X-BODY EQUIPMENT, INC., Jewell Attachments, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

November 12, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wayne M. Barsky , Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by Blaine H. Evanson , Jennifer Rho ; Casey James McCracken , Irvine, CA; Daniel M. Cislo , Kelly W. Cunningham , Mark D. Nielsen , Cislo & Thomas LLP, Los Angeles, CA.

Robert M. Harkins, Jr. , Locke Lord, LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by Hugh S. Balsam , Chicago, IL.

Before PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and STOLL, Circuit Judges.

Advanced Steel Recovery, LLC ("Advanced Steel") appeals the district court's summary judgment that X-Body Equipment, Inc. and Jewell Attachments, LLC (collectively, "X-Body") do not infringe the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,061,950 ("the '950 patent"). For the reasons below, we affirm as to both literal infringement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases