SCHAEFFLER GROUP USA, INC. v. U.S.

No. 2012-1269.

804 F.3d 1191 (2015)

SCHAEFFLER GROUP USA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, United States Customs And Border Protection, International Trade Commission, The Timken Company, MPB Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

October 30, 2015.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Max Fred Schutzman , Grunfeld Desiderio Lebowitz Silverman & Klestadt LLP, New York, NY, filed a petition for rehearing en banc for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by Andrew Thomas Schutz , Kavita Mohan , Washington, DC.

Martin M. Tomlinson , Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, filed a response to the petition for defendants-appellees United States, United States Customs and Border Protection. Also represented by Benjamin C. Mizer , Jeanne E. Davidson , Franklin E. White, Jr. ; Jessica Miller , Suzanna Hartzell-Ballard , Office of Assistant Chief Counsel, United States Customs and Border Protection, Indianapolis, IN.

Patrick Vincent Gallagher, Jr. , Office of the General Counsel, International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, filed a response to the petition for defendant-appellee International Trade Commission. Also represented by Robin Lynn Turner , James M. Lyons , Neal J. Reynolds .

Terence Patrick Stewart , Stewart & Stewart, Washington, DC, for defendants-appellees The Timken Company, MPB Corporation, filed a response to the petition. Also represented by Geert M. De Prest , Patrick John McDonough .

WALLACH, Circuit Judge, dissents from the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc.


ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

ORDER

A petition for rehearing en banc was filed by appellant Schaeffler Group USA, Inc., and responses thereto were invited by the court and filed by the appellees. The petition for rehearing and responses were referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter, to the circuit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases