1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SEQUIRA v. 3M COMPANY
 

SEQUIRA v. 3M COMPANY

Nos. 13-56921, 14-55383.

JONI SEQUIRA, successor-in-interest to PAUL OLDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. 3M COMPANY, AKA Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Defendant, and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, DBA Lockheed Martin Aeronautics, FKA Lockheed Martin Tactical Systems, Defendant-Appellee. JONI SEQUIRA, successor-in-interest to PAUL OLDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. 3M COMPANY, AKA Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Defendant, and UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Pratt and Whitney, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed October 27, 2015.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MEMORANDUM*

1. The district court did not err in granting summary judgment to Lockheed based on the government contractor defense. See Boyle v. United Techs. Corp., 487 U.S. 500, 512 (1988) (design defect claims); Getz v. Boeing Co., 654 F.3d 852

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases